Glory Assemblies of ChristGlory Assemblies of Christ

The Security of Salvation, Confession of Sins, Perseverance, and Divine Discipline

By Apostle Howard Tundu

The Security of Salvation, Confession of Sins, Perseverance, and Divine Discipline

By Apostle Howard Tundu

1. Introduction

The doctrine of salvation occupies a central place in Christian theology and pastoral practice. Yet few areas have suffered more from reductionism and selective reading of Scripture than the question of the believer's security, the role of confession of sins, and the reality of warnings addressed to the church. On one side, salvation is sometimes presented as so conditional that believers live in constant fear and uncertainty. On the other, it is framed as an irreversible status immune to unbelief, rebellion, or apostasy, regardless of how one lives thereafter.

This paper affirms that the New Testament does not support either extreme. Instead, it presents salvation as a gracious gift, genuinely received and powerfully effective, yet relational in nature and sustained through abiding faith, obedience, repentance, and perseverance. The Scriptures consistently hold together assurance and warning, forgiveness and discipline, security and responsibility. Any doctrine that suppresses one of these elements inevitably distorts the gospel.

2. The Nature of Salvation and Its Security

Salvation in the New Testament is not merely a legal declaration detached from lived relationship. While justification is indeed forensic and once-for-all, grounded solely in the finished work of Christ, it introduces the believer into a covenant relationship with God through union with Christ. Eternal life is not an abstract possession but a life shared with the Son. As Scripture states, "He who has the Son has life; he who does not have the Son of God does not have life" (1 John 5:12). Life is therefore located in Christ, not in a past confession isolated from present faith.

This explains why Scripture can speak with deep assurance, "there is now no condemnation for those who are in Christ Jesus" (Romans 8:1), while also issuing serious warnings to believers. Security is real, but it is covenantal, not mechanical. It is enjoyed through abiding, not presumed apart from relationship. To be "hidden with Christ in God" (Colossians 3:3) is to be secure; to abandon Christ is to abandon the sphere in which security exists.

3. Confession of Sins Under the New Covenant

A major area of confusion concerns confession of sins after conversion. Some assume that confession implies repeated loss and regaining of salvation, while others dismiss confession as unnecessary once one is justified. Both misunderstand the New Testament teaching.

The First Epistle of John is decisive. John writes to believers who already have fellowship with God and with one another. His repeated use of "we" makes this clear. When he states, "If we confess our sins, He is faithful and just to forgive us our sins and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness" (1 John 1:9), he is not describing the initial repentance of an unbeliever, but the ongoing maintenance of fellowship among those walking in the light.

The Greek term translated "confess" means to agree with or acknowledge. Confession, therefore, is not ritualised self-condemnation but honest alignment with God's judgment about sin. The forgiveness promised here is relational, not judicial. Justification has already dealt with condemnation; confession addresses the disruption of fellowship caused by sin in the believer's life. The Bible clearly mentions that the Holy Spirit can be grieved, also 1 Peter 3:7 hints that there are certain behaviours which can hinder prayer, while 1 John 1:7 states that there is fellowship if we walk in the light.

The statement that "the blood of Jesus cleanses us from all sin" (1 John 1:7) must be read in this relational context. It refers to the continual efficacy of Christ's sacrifice as believers walk in the light, not to repeated re-application of salvation itself. The cross is once-for-all; its cleansing power is continually effective.

4. The Lord's Prayer and Ongoing Forgiveness

The teaching of Jesus on prayer confirms that confession and forgiveness remain part of the believer's life under the New Covenant. When Jesus instructs His disciples to pray, "Forgive us our debts, as we forgive our debtors" (Matthew 6:12), He addresses those who already call God "Father." This prayer presupposes an ongoing covenant relationship, not a pre-conversion state.

The conditional statement that follows, "If you forgive others… your Father will forgive you" - does not imply that justification is withdrawn when a believer fails to forgive. Rather, it teaches that unforgiveness disrupts relational forgiveness and communion with God. This aligns seamlessly with 1 John: fellowship can be broken without sonship being immediately annulled.

The New Covenant removes condemnation, but it does not abolish relational accountability. Grace does not eliminate the need for humility, repentance, and forgiveness in the believer's walk.

5. James 5: Sin, Forgiveness, Healing, and the Restoration of Fellowship

James 5:13–20 is one of the most frequently misunderstood passages in the New Testament, particularly in discussions concerning confession of sins, forgiveness, and healing. Misinterpretation often arises when the text is read through later ecclesiastical practices rather than through its immediate literary, theological, and New Covenant context. A careful reading shows that James neither teaches human absolution of sin nor establishes mutual forgiveness as the basis of restoration. Rather, he presents a framework in which God alone forgives, while confession and prayer function as means of restoring fellowship and removing spiritual hindrances to healing.

5.1 Context: James Is Addressing Believers Under Discipline

James writes to "my brethren" throughout the epistle, clearly addressing believers within the covenant community. In chapter 5, he turns his attention to believers experiencing various conditions: suffering, joy, sickness, and spiritual weakness. The flow of the passage moves deliberately from prayer, to divine intervention, to restoration.

The sick person described in verses 14–15 is not merely physically ill but spiritually weakened. The call to summon the elders is not for medical expertise, but for spiritual oversight, prayer, and intercession before God. The anointing with oil functions symbolically and pastorally, not sacramentally, it is an outward act accompanying prayer directed to the Lord.

5.2 James 5:15 - Forgiveness Is Explicitly God's Act

James 5:15 states: "And the prayer of faith shall save the sick, and the Lord shall raise him up; and if he has committed sins, he shall be forgiven."

The grammatical and theological structure of the verse leaves no ambiguity concerning who forgives. First, the subject performing the action throughout the verse is the Lord. It is the Lord who raises the sick. It is therefore the Lord who forgives the sins. No agent shift occurs in the text. James does not say the elders forgive, nor the church forgives, nor one another forgive. The forgiveness is divine, not human.

Second, the passive phrase "he shall be forgiven" is a divine passive, a common Jewish and biblical way of referring to God's action without explicitly naming Him again. This construction is used consistently in Scripture to indicate God as the actor, particularly in matters of forgiveness, judgment, and restoration.

Third, the conditional clause "if he has committed sins" clarifies that not all sickness is caused by sin, but some sickness may be connected to unresolved sin. When sin is involved, forgiveness from God removes the spiritual barrier hindering restoration.

James therefore teaches that forgiveness precedes healing, and that forgiveness is granted by God in response to prayer offered in faith.

5.3 James 5:16 - Confession Without Human Absolution

Verse 16 continues: "Confess your trespasses to one another, and pray for one another, that you may be healed."

This verse is often misread as teaching mutual forgiveness or human mediation of pardon. However, the text does not say "forgive one another," nor does it say "that you may be forgiven." Instead, it says "that you may be healed."

This distinction is theologically decisive. Confession in this verse serves a different function from forgiveness. Confession as mentioned here is horizontal; forgiveness is vertical. Confession brings matters into the light, restores relational integrity within the body, and removes hypocrisy, secrecy, and pride that hinder spiritual vitality. Forgiveness, however, remains God's prerogative alone.

James' silence on mutual forgiveness here is not accidental. When Scripture intends to command forgiveness between believers, it does so explicitly (for example, "forgiving one another"). James does not use such language. Instead, he links confession and prayer to healing, not absolution.

The logic of the passage is therefore:

  • Sin disrupts fellowship with God and may affect the body.
  • Confession acknowledges sin and restores honesty and unity.
  • Prayer appeals to God.
  • God forgives and heals.

At no point does James assign the authority of forgiveness to human beings.

5.4 Why Confession Is Mutual but Forgiveness Is Divine

James requires confession "to one another" because sin rarely affects only the individual. It damages relationships, weakens communal trust, and introduces spiritual blockage within the body of Christ. Confession restores relational integrity and removes communal hindrances to God's work.

However, Scripture consistently teaches that sin is ultimately against God, even when it harms others. David's confession, "Against You, You only, have I sinned", captures this truth. While reconciliation with others is necessary, absolution belongs to God alone.

James preserves this theology carefully. He allows for mutual confession, mutual prayer, and mutual care, but he reserves forgiveness for God. This prevents the elevation of human mediators into the role of divine forgivers and safeguards the sufficiency of Christ's atoning work.

5.4.1 Jesus' Statement in John 20:23

Any doctrinal treatment of James 5 must also engage with Jesus' statement to His disciples: "If you forgive the sins of any, they are forgiven them; if you retain the sins of any, they are retained." (John 20:23)

At first glance, this statement appears to contradict the consistent New Testament teaching that forgiveness belongs to God alone. However, when interpreted in its immediate context, grammatical construction, and broader New Covenant theology, it becomes clear that Jesus is not transferring divine authority of absolution to human beings but commissioning His disciples to declare and administer the gospel, through which God forgives or retains sins.

5.4.2 The Context of John 20:23: Gospel Commission, Not Sacramental Absolution

John 20:23 occurs immediately after Jesus breathes on the disciples and says, "Receive the Holy Spirit," and just before He sends them as the Father sent Him. The setting is not liturgical confession, but apostolic commissioning.

This passage is parallel in meaning to:

  • "He who believes and is baptised shall be saved; he who does not believe shall be condemned"
  • "Repentance and forgiveness of sins should be preached in His name"

In all these cases, forgiveness or retention of sins is conditional upon response to the gospel, not upon a private act of human forgiveness. The disciples are authorised to announce forgiveness, not to originate it.

5.4.3 Declarative Authority, Not Creative Authority

The language of John 20:23 reflects what theologians often call declarative authority rather than creative authority.

Creative authority would mean humans cause forgiveness. Declarative authority means humans proclaim what God has done or will do.

This distinction is already present in Jesus' teaching elsewhere. When He says, "Whatever you bind on earth shall be bound in heaven," He does not mean heaven obeys human decisions; rather, earthly declarations align with heavenly realities.

Thus, when the church declares forgiveness to the repentant believer, it is announcing what God has already granted. When it warns the unrepentant that sins are retained, it is announcing the spiritual state that already exists before God.

5.4.4 Why James 5 Does Not Say "Forgive One Another"

This understanding explains why James 5:16 carefully avoids the language of mutual forgiveness. James does not say "forgive one another so that you may be healed." Instead, he says, "confess your trespasses to one another, and pray for one another, that you may be healed."

If James had intended to teach human absolution, this would have been the natural place to state it. Instead, James preserves the New Covenant pattern:

  • Confession → transparency and restored community
  • Prayer → appeal to God
  • Forgiveness → granted by the Lord
  • Healing → result of restored fellowship with God

James assumes what the rest of Scripture teaches: God forgives; believers declare, pray, and restore relationships, but do not absolve sin.

5.4.5 Practical Application: Two Levels of Forgiveness

In practical New Testament life, forgiveness operates on two levels:

  • Vertical forgiveness - granted by God through Christ, based on repentance and faith.
  • Horizontal reconciliation - exercised by believers toward one another to restore fellowship.

When Jesus speaks of forgiving or retaining sins, He is addressing the church's role in recognising repentance and proclaiming forgiveness, or in withholding affirmation where repentance is absent.

This is exactly what we see in church discipline passages, where the community affirms repentance or maintains separation until repentance occurs. Even then, forgiveness itself remains God's act; the church's role is declarative and restorative.

5.4.6 God's Exclusive Authority Preserved

Scripture is unequivocal that forgiveness of sins is ultimately God's prerogative. Jesus Himself was accused of blasphemy precisely because forgiveness belongs to God alone. Nowhere in the New Testament is that authority transferred away from God.

What changes in the New Covenant is access, not authority. Through Christ, forgiveness is preached openly; through the Spirit, the church proclaims it boldly; but forgiveness itself flows from God, through Christ, by grace.

James 5, 1 John 1, and John 20 therefore speak with one voice:

  • God forgives
  • Believers confess
  • The church proclaims forgiveness
  • Healing and restoration follow repentance

Therefore, when Jesus says, "If you forgive the sins of any, they are forgiven," He authorises the church to declare forgiveness on God's terms, not to dispense forgiveness independently.

5.5 Healing as the Outcome of Restored Fellowship

The stated purpose of confession and prayer in verse 16 is healing. Healing here is not merely physical; it is holistic. The term encompasses restoration of strength, vitality, and wholeness. The text assumes that unresolved sin can create spiritual conditions that manifest physically.

By directing confession toward openness and prayer toward God, James ensures that healing flows from restored fellowship with God, not from ritualised human absolution. This aligns with the wider New Testament teaching that healing often accompanies repentance, humility, and renewed alignment with God's will.

5.6 Consistency with the New Covenant

James' teaching fits seamlessly within New Covenant theology. Christ alone is the mediator between God and humanity. Forgiveness is secured through His sacrifice and applied by God Himself. Believers confess sins not to obtain repeated justification, but to maintain fellowship and spiritual health.

James therefore complements, rather than contradicts, texts such as 1 John 1 and the Lord's Prayer. Confession remains necessary; forgiveness remains divine; restoration remains relational.

5.7 What James 5 Does Not Establish

James 5 does not establish:

  • A priestly system of absolution
  • Mutual forgiveness as the basis of pardon
  • Confession as a sacrament that transmits grace

Instead, it teaches:

  • God forgives
  • Prayer accesses God's mercy
  • Confession removes relational and spiritual barriers
  • Healing flows from restored fellowship with God

Any reading that assigns the power of forgiveness to human agents imports foreign theology into the text and undermines the central New Testament affirmation that forgiveness of sins belongs to God alone.

5.8 James 5 in Harmony with 1 John 1 and Hebrews 12

James 5 must not be interpreted in isolation. When read alongside 1 John 1 and Hebrews 12, a consistent New Covenant theology emerges, one in which God alone forgives sin, confession restores fellowship, and discipline functions as loving correction, sometimes expressed through physical weakness or sickness.

5.8.1 James 5 and 1 John 1: Confession Directed Toward God

In 1 John 1:7–9, the apostle John teaches that believers who walk in the light experience ongoing cleansing through the blood of Jesus, and that confession of sin results in forgiveness and purification. Crucially, the forgiveness described is explicitly grounded in God's faithfulness and justice. God is the actor; believers are the responders.

James 5 reflects the same theological structure. In verse 15, forgiveness is granted by the Lord in response to prayer. In verse 16, confession occurs "to one another," but the outcome sought is healing, not forgiveness. This mirrors John's logic precisely:

  • Sin disrupts fellowship.
  • Confession brings sin into the light.
  • God forgives and cleanses.
  • Fellowship and vitality are restored.

Neither James nor John suggests that believers forgive sins in God's place. Instead, confession functions as an act of truthfulness and humility that removes relational and spiritual obstruction, allowing God's forgiving and healing work to proceed unhindered.

5.8.2 James 5 and Hebrews 12: Discipline as Loving Correction

Hebrews 12 provides the theological backdrop for understanding why James connects sin, sickness, and restoration. Hebrews teaches that God disciplines His children precisely because they belong to Him. Discipline is not punitive judgment but corrective love aimed at producing holiness and life.

When James speaks of sickness potentially connected to sin, he is not introducing a novel or harsh doctrine. He is describing one possible form of divine discipline already well established in Scripture. Hebrews explains the purpose behind such discipline: it is intended to yield "the peaceful fruit of righteousness" to those who are trained by it.

James therefore addresses discipline pastorally. Rather than encouraging believers to endure discipline silently or fatalistically, he instructs them to respond appropriately, by prayer, confession, and seeking spiritual oversight. The goal is not punishment, but restoration.

Importantly, Hebrews 12 makes clear that discipline occurs so that believers may share in God's holiness, not so that they may be cast off. This aligns with James' assurance that forgiveness accompanies repentance and prayer.

5.8.3 One Unified Flow: From Disruption to Restoration

When James 5, 1 John 1, and Hebrews 12 are read together, a single coherent movement becomes evident:

  • Sin disrupts fellowship with God and may invite divine discipline.
  • Confession acknowledges truth and removes concealment.
  • Prayer appeals to God's mercy and invites His intervention.
  • God forgives, heals, and restores the believer to wholeness.
  • The believer is renewed in obedience, holiness, and communion with God.

This unified theology stands in stark contrast to frameworks that either minimize sin's consequences (cheap grace) or that treat believers harshly and punitively (legalism). The New Testament instead holds together grace, truth, discipline, and restoration in a coherent whole.

Conclusion

The doctrine of salvation in the New Testament is one of profound security grounded in Christ, yet relational in nature. Believers are truly secure in Christ; they are also responsible to abide in Him through faith and obedience. Confession of sins is not a denial of justification but an expression of submission and a means of restoring fellowship. Divine discipline is not condemnation but correction aimed at holiness and life.

This integrated understanding preserves both the assurance of salvation and the warnings of Scripture, both the security of grace and the call to perseverance. To suppress either element is to miss the full counsel of God and to rob believers of the balanced, healthy understanding of their standing before God.